DC Art News reader Nathan Martin, in response to my question about the Kennedy Center honors, passes that "unfortunately, the Honors aren’t given to visual artists, nor are they given to poets, novelists or playwrights. Given that it’s the Kennedy Center "for the Performing Arts" it makes a certain amount of sense. Here’s the description from their web site:

"The Honors recipients are recognized for their lifetime contributions to American culture through the performing arts: whether in dance, music, theater, opera, motion pictures or television. The primary criterion in the selection process is excellence. The Honors are not designated by art form or category of artistic achievement; the selection process, over the years, has produced balance among the various arts and artistic disciplines."

He also suggests that "if visual artists were eligible, though, it would have to go to relatively respectable, late-in-their-career types like Jasper Johns, Wayne Thiebaud, Rauschenberg, etc. Maybe Joseph Stella or Louise Bourgeois in sculpture. Philip Johnson in architecture, maybe Gehry, Venturi and Graves in 10-15 years."

Good nominations! My question now: So what's the equivalent of the Kennedy Honors for visual artists? Should the National Gallery of Art institutionalize something? Do we even need it?

I recall that one of my art school professors, Jacob Lawrence, received a Presidential Medal of Freedom (I think) in the 1980s from Pres. Reagan. And yet he was and has been ignored by the NGA for a retrospective, although the Phillips Collection did organize a great one a few years ago.