Nothing against women; if you read this
blog consistently, then you know that I am generally against any and all museums that
segregate people by race (there are several race-centric museums in the US),
ethnicity (such as the planned National Museum of the American Latino in DC),
gender (such as the National Museum of Women in the Arts in DC), or any other
label, instead of leading efforts to incorporate those same people into the
major museums.
And yes, I do get the point that many of
those “other major museums” are essentially mostly focused on mostly men from or of
European ancestry.
Nonetheless, it is my position and I’ve
become used to people reacting to it by attacking me, rather than my ideas.
That is, unfortunately, collateral spillage from the toxic political dialogue
between the vast right wing conspiracy and the even vaster left wing nuthouse:
If you disagree with someone’s political ideas/position, then you attack the
person, rather than debate the ideas/position.
The new US History Women’s Museum will
be built, regardless of what I think, and as such, here are some early
suggestions, cough, cough…
First and foremost, mostly progressive,
liberal women are allowed to be honored and included in the museum, regardless
of any “firsts” or historical contributions that any overtly Republican or
Conservative woman has ever made to American history. We’re not sure of Betsy
Ross’ political leanings or most of those Revolutionary War women, so they’re
OK, as long as the DAR is not too enthused about any particular one of them.
Contemporary women are another issue and
the one where all the headlines will be made.
As such, in spite of the remarks that she made about Barack Obama, Geraldine Ferraro must be
included and honored as the first woman VP candidate from a major party; but
Crom save the poor curator who suggests even mentioning Sarah Palin! Second
doesn’t count anyway... right?
However, because of Ms. Ferraro's Obamistic remarks, the whole female VP part of US women's history may have to be skipped all together... cough, cough...
Representative Jeannette Rankin of Montana was the first woman to serve in
Congress, and she’ll probably need to be included, even though she was a
Republican. But since that was in 1917, those were the “good” Republicans back
then, so she’ll be OK.
All the other such
female political “firsts” will of course need to be there – after all they led
the way: Hattie Wyatt Caraway (first elected
female Senator), Nellie Tayloe Ross (first female elected governor
of a state), Esther Morris (first female
judge in the US)… and so on.
Mrs. Clinton hasn’t accomplished any firsts… yet…
and may have to wait and see if she gets elected in the next elections to
deserve inclusion in the museum… unless Senator Elizabeth Warren decides to run also and somehow beats Mrs. Clinton and then wins the Presidential election and will
thus become not only the first female President, but also the first Native
American President… cough, cough…
The museum will then, in order to be progressive,
have to include also female firsts according to race and ethnicity.
And in the race category, no one deserves to be
there more in these segregated categories than the vibrant Shirley Chisholm,
the first African-American woman elected to Congress – and in 1972 not only the
first woman, but the first African American (period) whose name was nominated
for President.
She was also my Congresswoman when I lived in Brooklyn and my
Congressional sponsor for the US Naval Academy. She nominated me in 1977 (and I
was accepted and offered an appointment!) for the class of 1981 – I declined
the appointment and instead went on to the University of Washington. When Chisholm
found out, she called me and yelled at me for half an hour on the phone and damned near changed my mind. She is
one of my personal heroes! If Shirley is not highlighted in this museum, I will
be pissed!
The first Latina elected to Congress will be
hugely problematic to include, as she is the fiery, brilliant (and very right
wing) Republican Ileana Ros-Lehtinen; a fellow peeps Cuban-American and another
personal hero of mine. I suspect that she will barely get a mention. Five gets
you ten that California’s very cute Loretta Sanchez gets more attention (even
though California’s Lucille Roybal was elected first, and no, I am not
objectifying congresswomen…).
Susana Martinez, also a Republican, will be also an
issue… she’s the first Latina elected to be a governor of a US state… What’s
with these Republicans electing all these minority women first? That's no way to win a war... Cough, cough...
Sally Ride, the first American
woman in space should be there… is that the best astronaut name ever?
Mae Jamison, first African
American woman in space and Ellen Ochoa, first Latina in space, will also be
there… other possibilities are first Jewish woman in space, first
Asian-American, etc.
Nanny Pelosi, as the first
female Speaker of the House is a shoo-in and rightly deserves to be there, will
be there, and it better be a damned good spot!
Although all the high schools
and streets are named after Cesar Chavez, once you do a little research, one
realizes that Dolores Huerta actually carried a lot of the load, did a lot of
the organizing and seldom got the credit that Chavez did; reserve a spot for
Huerta.
Military US women who paved the
way for today’s sailors, soldiers and airwomen should also be honored and a
special scientific spot as well should be reserved for Admiral Grace Hopper.
Will female entertainers be part
of the museum? That will be entertaining to see…
I'm pretty sure that today's Hollywood does not allow any Conservative woman to become a leading star, so we should be pretty safe from debate with anyone from the 60s onward.
If entertainers are included, don’t
forget Rita Hayworth (born Margarita
Carmen Cansino in Brooklyn) as she can
cover the Hispanic angle as her father was from Spain, but not the Latina
angle, as her father was… ahem, from Spain, and as some people know, Spain is
actually in Europe and not Latin America… cough, cough.
If only everything was that
easy!
Good luck to the US History
Women’s Museum; I know that your intentions are good, but you should have
fought better to have American women contributions to American history better
represented in the American History Museum, rather than segregating women in their own museum.
My original opening argument and
position usually falls on deaf ears, and DC’s only Frida Kahlo painting remains in the NMWA instead of the National Gallery of Art, where it belongs. 
