Why most modern art sucks:
The winner of the first £40,000 Artes Mundi Prize is a message written in dust. Martin Gaylord, writing in The Telegraph wonders "What has art become? It's hard to answer that question, except to say, "Very weird."
And Ben Issario, writing in the NY Times discusses the fact that "Internet Art" is dead and has reached digital exhaustion. Yet it wasn't that long ago that curators and critics - enamoured of what's new rather than what's good - were labeling Internet Art projects as the "new king of art."
This is what happens when novelty (sometimes coupled with shock or gimmick) is allowed to rule exclusively.
Both above links thanks to ArtsJournal.com.
Thursday, April 01, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment