Saturday, October 20, 2012

(e)merge's performance and critics

I've been scrubbing what art critics have been writing about the second iteration of DC's (e)merge art fair, which...
(a) they all agree has become the world's leading "performance art fair" and
(b) mostly get overwhelmed by sooooo much performance offerings that they get Artomatic Syndrome and
(c) are unable to have the brain power to process sooooo much performance,
 and then shut down after the first two or three and call it a day some, (such as the CP's fired-then-rehired art scribe), even make some newbie reporting mistakes (but hey - not the first time... right?). You get what you pay for...

But - and this is a nice surprise - the Pink Line Project's Eames Armstrong delivers what is the best piece on (e)merge's spectacular delivery of performance art. It is clear that Armstrong didn't just hang around the Skyline's Hotel's cool bar, drinking on the job after just watching a couple of performances, but returned to (e)merge a few times, watched several artists and then put down some intelligent thoughts for a superlative and insightful review of (e)merge's best offerings in their surprising unique strenght: performance art.

Bravo Zulu Eames! Check him out here.

3 comments:

Jarvis said...

Check out my Examiner.com article:
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-influence-of-photoshop-at-e-merge?cid=db_articles

Anonymous said...

I have read only one review at the CP by Kriston Kapps about artist Cano Villalobos. I think he makes a clear an organized assessment about her work that doesn't seem to have been made randomly. What other review are you talking about? I don't know who was hire and re-hire.

Lenny said...

There are other CP reviews that were on the print paper that for some reason don't show up on the CP website.