Wednesday, July 30, 2025

The curious case of the Smithsonian Institution and Anne Helmreich failing at its most basic task

Time to open up... my apologies in advance for the cursing - you can retire the Navy out of a former sailor, but you can never retire the sailor out of a sailor.

In the spirit of open transparency: As most of you know by now, I am now almost finished organizing a monster of a survey show for 2025 with the aim of not only exhibiting a curated, 15-venue exhibition to survey a snap shot of women artists working in the DMV region, and catalog them digitally, but to also leave a digital footprint of their 2025 presence for the future.

That show is "Women Artists of the DMV." More than 400 artists in (so far) 15 major art venues across the capital region!

As part of that process, starting in December 2024 I wrote multiple emails and mailed multiple old-school snail mail letters to offer the Smithsonian Institution the opportunity to archive the exhibition materials as part of a survey snapshot in time for DMV area female artists - at no acquisition cost - FREE!

The materials that I offered to the SI would consist of a flash drive which would contain a Powerpoint presentation documenting all curated female artists and one image per artist - I also made it clear that any digital format could be used as needed/recommended by then.  Additionally, in view of how fast technology ages, I would also include (at no cost) a digital screen device (a digital frame) to “play” the digital presentation as needed in the future.

Throughout January, February, March, and April I was ignored, and in May I blasted a: "Did you get my email?" email to every email address that I could find online from them.

On May 9, 2025, I got this response:

From: AAACollectionReview - AAACollectionReview@si.edu 

To: lenny@lennycampello.com

Copy: Helmrich, Anne L.

Dear Lenny Campello,
    Thank you for your interest in the Archives of American Art. Upon reviewing your inquiry, the Archives is not the proper home for the proposed collection. This decision reflects the ongoing needs, priorities, scope, and resources of the Archives rather than the value of the collection.
We are excited to see the exhibition when it comes together. A more suitable repository for a local survey show and a PowerPoint documenting the artists who submitted might be the National Museum of Women in the Arts, though each institution has their own priorities and archival acquisition strategy. Such records of exhibition submissions can be challenging for archival accessions, particularly regarding rights issues around images as well as preservation concerns around born-digital materials.
Thank you again for reaching out to the Archives of American Art —
The curatorial team

Archives of American Art | Smithsonian Institution

www.aaa.si.edublog.aaa.si.edu

 

DC Headquarters

FedEx/UPS/DHL: 750 9th Street NW | Suite 2200 |Washington, DC 20001

USPS: PO Box 37012, Victor Building 2200 | MRC 937 |Washington, DC  20013-7012


New York Office
300 Park Avenue South | Suite 300 | New York, NY 10010

Join us on Facebook | Twitter | Tumblr | Pinterest |Instagram


Subscribe to our podcast
My translation: You need to segregate an exhibition of female artists with an institution that focuses only on female art, because female artists are not the same as "American artists."

Am I the only one who sees how fucked up this response is?

Clearly they have no idea who they're fucking with, because I suspect that the SI knows zip fuck about the artists - male or female - in their own backyard.

I've written to my Senators (Chris Van Hollen and Angela Alsobrooks), and also to all the DMV area representatives... so far they've also ignored me. Have not yet written (but will) to Virginia senators Tim Kane and Mark Warner.

And thus: I need your help.

If you (like me) believe that part of the Smithsonian Institution Archives of American Art mandate and job is to fucking archive American art, and that the digital footprint of 400+ female artists working in the Greater Washington, DC is American art that needs to be archived... then PLEASE help me raise a fire in the tuchis of Anne Helmreich, Chris Van Hollen, Angela Alsobrooks, Tim Kane, Mark Warner, and whoever the fuck is the "curatorial team" that wants art by female artists segregated to a museum for just women artists.

Write to them... if they are on your "contacts" list in your cell phone, call them.

Art is art, regardless of the shape of the reproductive part shape of the artist.

Please help... all that I am asking the SI to do is to accept a free gift of a digital archive and keep it for future generations to know what female artists were doing around the DMV in 2025.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Lenny that is the nature of this place. I have noticed no change in this regard since 1994.

Anonymous said...

You got it!!! I'm on board. And I'm with you. They do not know who they're fucking with. You just lit a fire!!!

Anonymous said...

100% on target - this is not only a shame stain on the SI, but clearly they're bowing down to the current anti-women stances of you know who. I will make sure that Sen. Warner is aware of this.

Anonymous said...

I recall that you once said on the old Kojo Nmandi radio show something along the lines that "it was easier for a DC area museum curator to take a cab to Dulles to fly to Berlin, or London, or Madrid to visit emerging artists there, than to take a cab to Georgetown, Rockville or Alexandria to visit ANY artists in their own backyards."

This is a case of the SI just not caring about their own "backyard."
JN

Anonymous said...

We continue to be treated as ‘less than’

Delia Mychajluk said...

We continue to be treated as less than…

Anonymous said...

Betcha 100 clippers that the head lady works remotely

HANA is only one said...

As John Dewey wrote, ‘Art as aesthetic experience is a manifestation, a record, and celebration of the life of a civilization, a means for promoting its development … it is the ultimate judgment upon the quality of a civilization.’
Lenny’s devoted efforts to preserve and uplift the living voice of women artists in our time is nothing short of visionary.
It is deeply disappointing that the Smithsonian Institution chose to turn away from such a meaningful cultural record—one that could have served as a vital testament to our era’s artistic legacy. Some opportunities are too important to overlook.

Anonymous said...

Lenny im on board. Will do what it takes.

Anonymous said...

Lenny. I'm on board! Will do what it takes

economics made easy said...

Lenny, I'm on board. Will do what it takes